R-Value Calculations - 5"-3" with 2.0# vs. 6"-4" with 1.0#
Thickness is the critical factor for overall R-Value of hot tub covers. Keep in mind that the cover as a whole is a different R-Value calculation. The hot tub covers core is only one of the elements of the overall cover R-Value. The examples below are ONLY for the hot tub covers foam core, and will show that the cover’s thickness is a more important factor than the cover’s foam density.
Lets compare upgrading a 5"- 3" slope hot tub cover to 2.0# foam with a 6" - 4" slope with 1.0# foam.
5” – 3” slope hot tub covers with 1.0 pound foam
Average foam thickness = 4”
1.0 pound foam’s R-factor is 4.17 at 40 degrees F
R-value of the foam only would be 4” X 4.17 = 16.68
6” – 4” slope hot tub covers with 1.0 pound foam
Average foam thickness = 5”
1.0 pound foam’s R-factor is 4.17 at 40 degrees F
R-value of the foam only would be 5” X 4.17 = 20.85
Now, if the same 5” – 3” slope cover is upgraded to 2.0 pound foam:
5” – 3” slope hot tub covers with 2.0 pound foam
Average foam thickness = 4”
2.0 pound foam’s R-factor is 4.76 at 40 degrees F
R-value of the foam only would be 4” X 4.76 = 19.04
The the 6” – 4” with 1.0# foam has a higher R-Value than 5” – 3” with 2.0# foam !
|